Free Wine
Wine is funny stuff. It’s slippery. So many people want to nail it down to a 100 point scale it is almost comical. The reason it’s so funny is because it can’t be done. It’s like watching someone try to rake water uphill.
There are a lot of things at play, but I want to focus on two: matters of taste and matters of the mind.
Wine, more than many other foods, is dramatically affected by what has immediately preceded it. This is one of the reasons I’m always concerned when cheese is served at a wine tasting. If you are eating cheese, your perceptions of the wine will be drastically different. You can try this at home if you like, it just takes a little concentration. Try the wine before you have a bite of the cheese, and again immediately following the bite and note the differences.
Other factors are involved in the physiology of how a wine tastes. It’s temperature, the size and shape of the glass the wine’s been served in, the age of the bottle, the storage conditions of a bottle, the condition of the cork, and even other ambient smells, are just a few of many. But in some form or another, these things can be controlled for.
It’s the matters of the mind that are much trickier.
There is a reason prestige bottles of wine don’t always win blind tastings. It’s because the things that set them apart are their history, scarcity, and demand and not just the juice inside the bottle. If Screaming Eagle could have produced an identical wine while increasing production to 100,000 cases (up from about 500), it would be just one of a number of very good expensive wines, and not the cult phenomenon it became.
But because of its scarcity, it is very expensive. And that expense, in addition to the high expectations that are the wine is now imbued with, absolutely affect the way a consumer tastes it.
It actually works both ways, but I don’t think they cancel each other out.
1) If one pays a lot of money for a wine, one will want to like it regardless of how it tastes
2) If one pays a lot of money for a wine, one will have higher expectations for it, which it may not fulfill
Perhaps this is why some of my best wine experiences have involved wine that was free.
No kidding. The chardonnay that changed my mind, the amazing wines on the VIP tour at Mondavi, the stunning bottles friends have shared, and the generous gifts we have been given over time have done more to shape my love of wine than the bottles I have purchased myself.
And I’ve bought a lot of wine. Some of it has even been very good.
I’ve also found my way to a handful of my favorite wines because I first was introduced to them for free. Two immediately come to mind. One was the sauvignon blanc that I was served at a party that just knocked me off my feet. I had to inquire as to what it was, so I could run out and buy some for myself. The other is a gewürztraminer only available at the winery, my first free tasting of which was so exquisite that I kept on coming back year after year.
Now, I mention all of this because I will hopefully be getting some free wine in the near future in the service of this blog. Naturally, I’ll be telling you a bit about it, although I doubt you would expect it to be evaluated on a 100-point scale.
But I do believe that in many regards free wine tastes better than wine you pay for. So that will need to be something that you keep in mind as you read future wine posts. But don’t worry. I’ll be entirely transparent, as always, when I’ve gotten something for free. And as appropriate, I will link back to today’s post.



I think this post hits on two really interestings concepts. Free wine tastes better than wine you pay for. On an absolute scale? Depends. Comparatively? Probably. You inherently judge a free wine on a lower scale than one you paid for because what are you giving up to get this free wine? Just the time it takes to drink it really, which compared to the $10, $20 or whatever you paid, is dirt cheap. Same when reviewing restaurants, it’s about the comparative value.
Second, you’re basically talking about the effect of price on the enjoyment of wine. Well, economists like wine (John Cochrane included http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/07/11/264847/paul-ryan-dinner-buddy-john-cochrane-offers-a-sum-of-all-right-wing-fears/). The American Association of Wine Economists have published many articles detailing what you’re hinting at- for the most part, typical wine drinkers won’t be able to taste the difference between a $10 bottle, and a $350 one. Yet with the prices known, they surely will think otherwise. Further proof good wine need not be expensive.
http://www.wine-economics.org/workingpapers/
Daniel,
Would you tell us please what (other than wanting free wine) qualifies you to review wine? Have you passed even the basic sommelier level exam? Are you studying for your MW? If so, what level? Do you know what an MW is? Have you ever or are you currently working selling wine for a supplier? Have you ever worked in the wine business in any way, say, as a store clerk? Have you traveled to multiple wine regions touring and tasting the local products?
Just curious as you are about to potentially affect the sales (on a small scale) of products that many people work very hard to produce…and whose livelihoods depend on those sales. True, you could blog about what YOU like (or don’t like)…but that will be only your very limited perspective and as I am sure you know, everyone’s taste is different.