Skip to content

The Truth Will Set You Free

November 10, 2011

If you are reading this, I think it’s probably safe to assume that on some level you care about what you eat. After all, this is a food blog, and you aren’t here looking for parenting advice or fashion tips. Actually, I don’t really know why you are here, but that’s a whole different topic.

I’m the primary food shopper in our family, and I’m a label reader.

Reading labels is a pain in the ass, especially if you have children in tow. Sometimes it just cannot effectively be done, regardless of the Nutrition Facts’ simple, clear and standardized design. But I think it is important to know what is in the food I’m buying and feeding to my kids.

The successful dynamics of a free market depend on the consumer’s ability to make informed decisions. This is one of the reasons that Trans Fats were added to the Nutrition Facts. Not long after that, trans fats seemed to disappear from a surprising number of packaged foods.

But food labels don’t give you the full story.

Before I continue, I want to make sure you know something. I’m watching you. I’m watching how many of you made the jump to the rest of this story, and I’m watching what links you click on in the post.

Now I can’t tell who is doing what. I’m only looking at aggregates, so your privacy is still intact. But in a little while, I’m going to ask for you to help me with something, that requires very little on your part. And I’m hoping to see as much fire as you demonstrated for the Empire State of Mind Cocktail a few weeks back.

Food labels in the U.S. contain no information about GMOs.

Surprisingly, Mrs. Fussy has fewer qualms than I do with scientists mucking around with nature and the environment to create patentable forms of life. I’m not convinced that these feats of modern science aren’t at least partially responsible for the problems being experienced by the bees. And I’m fairly convinced, given the history of science and innovation, that there will be unforeseen consequences to our reliance on these bioengineered crops.

Maybe your own beliefs are closer to Mrs. Fussy’s. Maybe you are in my camp. But regardless of your concern about the safety of GMOs, I find it hard to argue against the notion that products that include genetically altered ingredients be labeled as such.

They label GMOs in the E.U. They are labeled in Australia and New Zealand. Even Russia and China are on board. But not the U.S. Which isn’t to say labeling isn’t desired domestically. One group which is supporting this initiative is saying:

A recent poll released by ABC News found that 93 percent of the American public wants the federal government to require mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods. As ABC News stated, “Such near-unanimity in public opinion is rare.”

In truth, the poll to which they refer isn’t quite so recent. That would be from June 2001, just a year after the GMO Starlink corn fiasco. But it’s a great number for rhetorical purposes. However, I cannot help but feel the country is more divided now than ever on the subject of government regulation.

The thing is I’m not arguing for regulation. I just want transparency.

More recently there was a 2008 CBS News/New York Times poll that supports the same sentiment. It found, “87% of consumers would like GMO ingredients to be labeled.” Although there is even a more recent poll that supports the 93% number, conducted in 2010 on behalf of NPR.

Food producers are dragging their feet because they suspect labeling will be the kiss of death for all these patented plants. Although that might be overly dramatic. GMOs are here to stay, and labeling will simply cut into profits, as some fraction of shoppers shy away from these newly discovered bioengineered foods.

But maybe if producers are compelled to label their products, they might push companies like Monsanto to publish more compelling research into the safety of GMOs. Although I suppose it’s more likely that they will spend their money on an advertising campaign to make it seem as right as rain. Not that I’m cynical or anything. I’ve just seen it done before.

The only way we’ll know is if we push for labeling. And that’s what I’m asking for your help with today.

All you do is click here, enter your name, state, zip code and email. Then click submit. It should take seconds, unless you are reading this on a mobile device or accessing the web over a dial-up connection. If you wanted to do even more, send this call to action along to all your friends. There are some convenient buttons located beneath this post to help you in that regard.

Now I’m watching you. And for everyone that doesn’t click through, I’m expecting to read a comment about why you think labeling GMOs on food packaging isn’t worth five more seconds of your time.

Please support this initiative. It’s important. And frankly it’s ridiculous that our government is reluctant to put this into play on its own. I guess the big food lobby is more compelling than the 87-93%.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. Valerie MacMillan (@WrigsMac)'s avatar
    November 10, 2011 11:34 am

    Great post. Weren’t Cheetos the first big thing to hit the market with GMO corn back in the day? I used to be a rabid label reader. After a while, I had my core set of products I would buy and got lazy about reading labels. I still get irritable about things like “natural flavor”. Besides GMOs, companies are allowed to skirt other ingredients on a label that I’m sure would freak out the average consumer (don’t tell bakers where red dye comes from!).

    BTW, I clicked the link through my RSS reader before I came over to comment so don’t shoot.

  2. Mirdreams's avatar
    Mirdreams permalink
    November 10, 2011 12:51 pm

    And if you want to bring it up with people in tee shirt form Threadless can help: http://thrdl.es/p/3228

  3. James's avatar
    James permalink
    November 10, 2011 1:01 pm

    While I can find virtue in more transparency in the food production process, at this time, labeling GMO products would only serve to spread the belief that these products are somehow different and less safe than their traditionally grown counterparts. The fact is that genetically modified crops have revolutionized agriculture since their introduction by increasing crop yields and stabilizing the supply of essential commodity crops. Also, there is an overwhelming body of research stating that there are no observable differences between GM crops and traditional but, the few studies that are contrary to this seem to be the ones everyone points to in order to prove GMO’s are evil and they should be removed from everything. The reality is that people have been consuming GMO crops for over 15 years with no observed ill effect on their health of well-being.
    Why does everyone want to see GMO containing products labeled? Because they think that messing with nature is inherently bad. The truth is that intelligent design and engineering, by humans, makes a lot more sense than the random way in which nature adapts to problems. The way to help as many people around the world as possible is not to try to return to the way agriculture was 100 years ago but to embrace the capabilities we now have.

    • Jessica's avatar
      Jessica permalink
      November 11, 2011 11:51 pm

      Why are you so quick to believe in a system that brought you the lovely TRANS FAT that caused so many problems but wasn’t discovered to until decades AFTER humans started ingesting them. Other countries do not allow the use of GMO’s due to the fact that there are no long term health studies completed on the health consequences, but alas, I am sure they know nothing! You say that intelligent engineering makes more sense, but the reduction of genetic diversity can have disastrous effects on crops because they won’t be able to handle drought, insect infestations, or fungal infections as well as a group of plants with a diverse genetic material. This, by the way, means that the farmers will have to use obscene amounts of herbicides, fungicides, and pesticides (YES, all of them) which are poisonous to have running off into our water supply…for us humans to ingest! Oh and my last problem with GMO’s, at least that I am going to mention here, is that once we start growing things that are genetically engineered there is no cleaning it up….guess what? that means that in 20 years when we find out that these “intelligently designed” plants are no good for us, there won’t be shit we can do about it.

  4. mr.dave's avatar
    November 10, 2011 2:37 pm

    Yeah, I kind of agree with James. I, for one, welcome our hybrid Corn/Chimpanzee/Beetle overlords.

  5. KB @ Home-Baked Happiness's avatar
    November 10, 2011 2:51 pm

    I think my biggest fear is that we’ll find out that GMOs have so infiltrated our food supply that if you don’t eat them, there’s not much left to eat.

  6. Burnt My Fingers's avatar
    November 10, 2011 3:19 pm

    I am impressed by James’ argument. I don’t condemn GMO foods unconditionally, and I hadn’t thought about the chilling effect that putting “CONTAINS GMOS” on the label would have. Besides, that’s not the place to fight the battle. The biggest danger, aside from the possibility that a GMO rice is going to cure hunger or something, is contamination of non-GMO fields. There should be clear labeling at the field boundaries and rules for separating GMO and non-GMO fields. Actually, I think these rules may already exist in some form or another. Need to go look it up.

    • Jessica's avatar
      Jessica permalink
      November 11, 2011 11:32 pm

      oh and the fact that huge GMO producers can sue small farmers for having their crops contaminated with their GMO’s by no fault of the small farmer. Our food should be grown on small farms with in at maximum a few hours drive from where it will be consumed. AND if people would eat more vegetables and not as much of the mass produced meat, we WOULD NOT NEED to grown obscene amounts of corn!!!!!

  7. derryX's avatar
    November 10, 2011 4:00 pm

    I signed the petition, but I think it’s something that’s nice to know for the consumer. James makes some great arguments from a statistical and scientific perspective. I’d like to add that much of the technology and research that goes into GMOs is parallel to some of the genetic engineering going on in healthcare research; hopefully, such reform and information does not discourage this research from moving forward, as good things can come out of it.

Leave a reply to mr.dave Cancel reply